https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352574 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Original Authority for a fresh decision. The appellants' concerns regarding valuation, confiscation, time-barred demands, mis-declaration allegations, denial of exemptions, legal provisions, comparisons with contemporaneous imports, and confiscation of goods not in custody were acknowledged, emphasizing the necessity for detailed examinations on these issues. The Tribunal found the confiscation of all goods covered by 14 bills of entries to be legally unsustainable and directed a re-examination of the confiscation and redemption fine. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352574 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the Original Authority for a fresh decision. The appellants' concerns regarding valuation, confiscation, time-barred demands, mis-declaration allegations, denial of exemptions, legal provisions, comparisons with contemporaneous imports, and confiscation of goods not in custody were acknowledged, emphasizing the necessity for detailed examinations on these issues. The Tribunal found the confiscation of all goods covered by 14 bills of entries to be legally unsustainable and directed a re-examination of the confiscation and redemption fine. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352574