<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 838 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order regarding tax liability under the category of &quot;construction of complex service&quot; for building less than 12 individual houses, as it lacked sufficient evidence to establish the houses as part of a residential complex. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the recovery of amount under GTA service for services received from individual truck owners without consignment notes was not subject to tax liability. Consequently, the appeal of the appellants was allowed on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 838 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order regarding tax liability under the category of &quot;construction of complex service&quot; for building less than 12 individual houses, as it lacked sufficient evidence to establish the houses as part of a residential complex. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the recovery of amount under GTA service for services received from individual truck owners without consignment notes was not subject to tax liability. Consequently, the appeal of the appellants was allowed on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>