<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 834 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352565</link>
    <description>The Appellant, a Corporate Debtor, successfully challenged an order treating an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (I&amp;amp;B) Code, 2016 by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal found that the Respondent, an Operational Creditor, failed to comply with I&amp;amp;B Code provisions, including notice issuance and proper admission procedures. Due to these deficiencies, the application under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be considered under Section 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, leading to its abatement. The impugned order was overturned, and the Appellant was released from legal constraints, with directions to close the proceedings without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 834 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352565</link>
      <description>The Appellant, a Corporate Debtor, successfully challenged an order treating an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (I&amp;amp;B) Code, 2016 by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal found that the Respondent, an Operational Creditor, failed to comply with I&amp;amp;B Code provisions, including notice issuance and proper admission procedures. Due to these deficiencies, the application under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be considered under Section 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, leading to its abatement. The impugned order was overturned, and the Appellant was released from legal constraints, with directions to close the proceedings without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>