<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 827 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, to address the issues raised in the petition on merit, emphasizing expeditious disposal. The Tribunal also ordered that any Board Resolution removing the appellant as Director should not be implemented until the case is resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 827 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, to address the issues raised in the petition on merit, emphasizing expeditious disposal. The Tribunal also ordered that any Board Resolution removing the appellant as Director should not be implemented until the case is resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>