<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TPO and DRP failed to benchmark taxpayer prices with comparable entities, violating rule 10B(1)(a) in transfer pricing case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37197</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment - In the entire episode, there is no reference to the price paid by the comparables as a yardstick for comparing with the price paid by the assessee. The approach adopted by the TPO, as approved by the DRP, does not conform to the prescription of rule 10B(1)(a) - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:04:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:04:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TPO and DRP failed to benchmark taxpayer prices with comparable entities, violating rule 10B(1)(a) in transfer pricing case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37197</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment - In the entire episode, there is no reference to the price paid by the comparables as a yardstick for comparing with the price paid by the assessee. The approach adopted by the TPO, as approved by the DRP, does not conform to the prescription of rule 10B(1)(a) - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:04:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>