https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196858 In preventive detention matters, all relied upon documents form part of the grounds that must be supplied under Article 22(5); non-supply in the original language and delayed service of the grounds and supporting material vitiated the detention order. The detention was therefore held invalid. On territorial jurisdiction, the High Court could entertain the writ because the detenu's representation seeking transfer was made, rejected, and communicated at Hyderabad, so part of the cause of action arose there. The petition succeeded on both the merits and the jurisdictional objection, and the detenu was directed to be released forthwith. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196858 In preventive detention matters, all relied upon documents form part of the grounds that must be supplied under Article 22(5); non-supply in the original language and delayed service of the grounds and supporting material vitiated the detention order. The detention was therefore held invalid. On territorial jurisdiction, the High Court could entertain the writ because the detenu's representation seeking transfer was made, rejected, and communicated at Hyderabad, so part of the cause of action arose there. The petition succeeded on both the merits and the jurisdictional objection, and the detenu was directed to be released forthwith. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196858