https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196856 Territorial jurisdiction in a preventive detention habeas corpus petition lies where a substantial part of the cause of action arises, including service of the detention order and deprivation of liberty; the place of seizure alone does not oust jurisdiction, so the High Court could entertain the petition. Non-supply of vital documents specifically sought by the detenue, where those documents were necessary for an effective further representation, infringed the constitutional right of representation and vitiated the detention; the objections on the form of the representation and on prejudice were rejected, and the detention was quashed. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 17:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196856 Territorial jurisdiction in a preventive detention habeas corpus petition lies where a substantial part of the cause of action arises, including service of the detention order and deprivation of liberty; the place of seizure alone does not oust jurisdiction, so the High Court could entertain the petition. Non-supply of vital documents specifically sought by the detenue, where those documents were necessary for an effective further representation, infringed the constitutional right of representation and vitiated the detention; the objections on the form of the representation and on prejudice were rejected, and the detention was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196856