https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196851 Serious and substantial allegations of fraud, especially where detailed oral and documentary evidence is required and the claims extend to parties outside the arbitration agreement, may make a dispute unsuitable for reference under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Bombay High Court article also notes that an arbitration clause naming two possible arbitrators is not defeated merely because both decline to act; absent clear contrary intention, the statutory scheme permits substitution and continuation of the arbitral process. On that reasoning, arbitration was refused on the fraud issue, while the objection based on the named arbitrators' unwillingness was rejected. en-us Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:51:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196851 Serious and substantial allegations of fraud, especially where detailed oral and documentary evidence is required and the claims extend to parties outside the arbitration agreement, may make a dispute unsuitable for reference under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Bombay High Court article also notes that an arbitration clause naming two possible arbitrators is not defeated merely because both decline to act; absent clear contrary intention, the statutory scheme permits substitution and continuation of the arbitral process. On that reasoning, arbitration was refused on the fraud issue, while the objection based on the named arbitrators' unwillingness was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196851