https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196846 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines second appellate jurisdiction to substantial questions of law, and the High Court must decide the questions framed at admission unless it records reasons for additional questions. A substantial question of law must be debatable, unsettled, and material to the parties' rights; a new point cannot normally be raised for the first time in second appeal. Reappreciation of evidence to disturb concurrent findings of fact is impermissible unless perversity, no evidence, or misreading is shown. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reassessing facts without deciding the formulated questions, so its judgment could not stand and the decrees of the courts below were restored. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:16:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196846 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines second appellate jurisdiction to substantial questions of law, and the High Court must decide the questions framed at admission unless it records reasons for additional questions. A substantial question of law must be debatable, unsettled, and material to the parties' rights; a new point cannot normally be raised for the first time in second appeal. Reappreciation of evidence to disturb concurrent findings of fact is impermissible unless perversity, no evidence, or misreading is shown. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reassessing facts without deciding the formulated questions, so its judgment could not stand and the decrees of the courts below were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196846