https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352548 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appellant's appeal against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, reducing the penalty imposed on the authorized signatory for irregular availment of CENVAT credit on input services. The decision emphasized the broad interpretation of 'input services' under the CENVAT Credit Rules, highlighting the importance of legal arguments and precedents in determining CENVAT credit eligibility and penalties. The Department's appeal against the penalty reduction was dismissed in light of the appellant's successful challenge. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352548 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appellant's appeal against the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, reducing the penalty imposed on the authorized signatory for irregular availment of CENVAT credit on input services. The decision emphasized the broad interpretation of 'input services' under the CENVAT Credit Rules, highlighting the importance of legal arguments and precedents in determining CENVAT credit eligibility and penalties. The Department's appeal against the penalty reduction was dismissed in light of the appellant's successful challenge. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352548