https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196834 Admissions bind only the party making them, an authorised agent, or a person with a proprietary, pecuniary or derivative interest in the subject matter. An affidavit filed by a non-party to the tenancy could not be treated as binding admission against the tenant, and once that material was excluded there was no reliable evidence of exclusive possession to sustain a finding of subletting or parting with possession under the Delhi Rent Control Act. A finding resting mainly on inadmissible evidence is legally vitiated, and the High Court could re-examine the remaining record and reject oral testimony on proper appraisal. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:43:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196834 Admissions bind only the party making them, an authorised agent, or a person with a proprietary, pecuniary or derivative interest in the subject matter. An affidavit filed by a non-party to the tenancy could not be treated as binding admission against the tenant, and once that material was excluded there was no reliable evidence of exclusive possession to sustain a finding of subletting or parting with possession under the Delhi Rent Control Act. A finding resting mainly on inadmissible evidence is legally vitiated, and the High Court could re-examine the remaining record and reject oral testimony on proper appraisal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196834