<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 812 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352543</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeals concerning the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decisions on bogus purchases and unexplained cash deposits. For the bogus purchases, the Tribunal reduced the addition to 5% based on evidence of genuine transactions, which the HC upheld, finding no substantial legal question. Regarding unexplained cash deposits, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that deposits were from available cash balance, properly recorded, and the HC confirmed this, noting no defects in the cash book. The Tribunal&#039;s orders were upheld, and no further legal intervention was deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 812 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352543</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeals concerning the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decisions on bogus purchases and unexplained cash deposits. For the bogus purchases, the Tribunal reduced the addition to 5% based on evidence of genuine transactions, which the HC upheld, finding no substantial legal question. Regarding unexplained cash deposits, the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that deposits were from available cash balance, properly recorded, and the HC confirmed this, noting no defects in the cash book. The Tribunal&#039;s orders were upheld, and no further legal intervention was deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>