<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 808 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the disallowance under Section 14A but dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the amortization of software expenditure due to the rectification order. The Tribunal emphasized the principle that disallowance under Section 14A should not exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 808 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the disallowance under Section 14A but dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the amortization of software expenditure due to the rectification order. The Tribunal emphasized the principle that disallowance under Section 14A should not exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>