<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 803 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals for all assessment years. It was found that the AO&#039;s additions were not supported by sufficient evidence, leading to the conclusion that treating the entire purchases as inflated was unwarranted. The Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the additions for all years under appeal, determining that the AO&#039;s actions were not justified or sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:33:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 803 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals for all assessment years. It was found that the AO&#039;s additions were not supported by sufficient evidence, leading to the conclusion that treating the entire purchases as inflated was unwarranted. The Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the additions for all years under appeal, determining that the AO&#039;s actions were not justified or sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>