<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 790 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352521</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the penalty of Rs. 15,20,000/- was unjustified and illegal due to invalid jurisdiction assumption, lack of clarity in the penalty notice, and failure to record proper satisfaction. The penalty was ordered to be deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. Other issues raised were not addressed as the penalty deletion was based on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 790 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352521</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the penalty of Rs. 15,20,000/- was unjustified and illegal due to invalid jurisdiction assumption, lack of clarity in the penalty notice, and failure to record proper satisfaction. The penalty was ordered to be deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. Other issues raised were not addressed as the penalty deletion was based on jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>