<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 779 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352510</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court held that the State lacked legislative competence to regulate possession, use, sale, import, export and transport of denatured spirit after denaturation under the Bombay Prohibition Act and the Bombay Denatured Spirit Rules. It reasoned that constitutional entries permitting regulation of intoxicating liquor and alcoholic liquors for human consumption do not extend to denatured spirit, which is unfit for consumption. The State may regulate industrial alcohol only to prevent diversion or misuse for potable purposes and may levy reasonable regulatory fees for that limited purpose. The licensing regime for denatured spirit was therefore struck down, while the limited power to prevent diversion of rectified spirit for human consumption was preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 779 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352510</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court held that the State lacked legislative competence to regulate possession, use, sale, import, export and transport of denatured spirit after denaturation under the Bombay Prohibition Act and the Bombay Denatured Spirit Rules. It reasoned that constitutional entries permitting regulation of intoxicating liquor and alcoholic liquors for human consumption do not extend to denatured spirit, which is unfit for consumption. The State may regulate industrial alcohol only to prevent diversion or misuse for potable purposes and may levy reasonable regulatory fees for that limited purpose. The licensing regime for denatured spirit was therefore struck down, while the limited power to prevent diversion of rectified spirit for human consumption was preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>