https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352499 The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, remanding the case for proper quantification and sanctioning of refunds under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The impugned order was found to contradict judicial precedents, and the incorrect export turnover calculation was noted. The appellant's claims of input services were validated based on precedent cases, leading to the decision to remand the matter for accurate application of the refund formula. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:30:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352499 The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, remanding the case for proper quantification and sanctioning of refunds under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The impugned order was found to contradict judicial precedents, and the incorrect export turnover calculation was noted. The appellant's claims of input services were validated based on precedent cases, leading to the decision to remand the matter for accurate application of the refund formula. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352499