https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352498 In revenue matters, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised where an effective statutory appellate remedy is available, as the rule against bypassing that remedy remains a self-imposed restraint. The recognised exceptions for lack of jurisdiction or total violation of natural justice were not established on the facts. Complaints concerning limitation, alleged suppression, appreciation of records, and adequacy of hearing were factual issues that could be pursued before the appellate authority. The writ court's refusal to interfere was therefore sustained, and the writ appeal was held not maintainable for attempting to circumvent the statutory remedy. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352498 In revenue matters, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised where an effective statutory appellate remedy is available, as the rule against bypassing that remedy remains a self-imposed restraint. The recognised exceptions for lack of jurisdiction or total violation of natural justice were not established on the facts. Complaints concerning limitation, alleged suppression, appreciation of records, and adequacy of hearing were factual issues that could be pursued before the appellate authority. The writ court's refusal to interfere was therefore sustained, and the writ appeal was held not maintainable for attempting to circumvent the statutory remedy. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352498