https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352491 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision of the Commissioner (A) and holding that in the case of export of goods, the place of removal is the port of export. This entitled the appellant to claim CENVAT credit on GTA service up to the port. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering binding judicial precedent in reaching this decision, which was based on a thorough analysis of legal arguments and precedents presented by both parties. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:29:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352491 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision of the Commissioner (A) and holding that in the case of export of goods, the place of removal is the port of export. This entitled the appellant to claim CENVAT credit on GTA service up to the port. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering binding judicial precedent in reaching this decision, which was based on a thorough analysis of legal arguments and precedents presented by both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352491