https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352488 The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (A)'s order partially allowing a refund claim due to the unjust enrichment bar. The appellant, a manufacturer of hot re-rolled steel products, successfully argued that the unjust enrichment principle did not apply as the duty payment occurred after goods clearance. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief. en-us Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Dec 2017 10:29:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352488 The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (A)'s order partially allowing a refund claim due to the unjust enrichment bar. The appellant, a manufacturer of hot re-rolled steel products, successfully argued that the unjust enrichment principle did not apply as the duty payment occurred after goods clearance. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352488