https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196819 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, upholding the Trial Judge's decision to wait for further evidence before summoning the appellant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The SC emphasized that the Trial Judge appropriately exercised discretionary jurisdiction by requiring sufficient evidence before summoning an individual not initially charged. The Court stressed that Section 319 should be invoked sparingly, ensuring the requisite conditions are met and a likelihood of conviction is established. The SC underscored the need for judicial discretion and proper satisfaction based on evidence in such matters. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196819 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, upholding the Trial Judge's decision to wait for further evidence before summoning the appellant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The SC emphasized that the Trial Judge appropriately exercised discretionary jurisdiction by requiring sufficient evidence before summoning an individual not initially charged. The Court stressed that Section 319 should be invoked sparingly, ensuring the requisite conditions are met and a likelihood of conviction is established. The SC underscored the need for judicial discretion and proper satisfaction based on evidence in such matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196819