https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196818 Clause 15 of the quarry lease, which referred disputes about construction of the lease deed, quarry operations, and rent or royalty to the lessor's final decision, was treated as an arbitration agreement under the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Act was regarded as a complete code with its own remedies for challenging an award under Sections 32 and 33, so writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not an appropriate substitute. Accordingly, the award and demand notice could not be challenged by writ petition, and the challenge was held not maintainable. en-us Wed, 22 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:39:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196818 Clause 15 of the quarry lease, which referred disputes about construction of the lease deed, quarry operations, and rent or royalty to the lessor's final decision, was treated as an arbitration agreement under the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Act was regarded as a complete code with its own remedies for challenging an award under Sections 32 and 33, so writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not an appropriate substitute. Accordingly, the award and demand notice could not be challenged by writ petition, and the challenge was held not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196818