<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Extra 5% Duty on Petitioner&#039;s Imports Unjustified; Appeal Succeeds Against Authority&#039;s Order.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37183</link>
    <description>Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) - The imposition of such duty of EDD equivalent to 5% on all the Bill of Entry filed by the petitioner would be beyond the scope of the order passed by the first respondent, as the petitioner succeeded before the LAA - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:37:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Extra 5% Duty on Petitioner&#039;s Imports Unjustified; Appeal Succeeds Against Authority&#039;s Order.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37183</link>
      <description>Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) - The imposition of such duty of EDD equivalent to 5% on all the Bill of Entry filed by the petitioner would be beyond the scope of the order passed by the first respondent, as the petitioner succeeded before the LAA - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:37:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>