<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1229 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196815</link>
    <description>Gross medical negligence of a very high degree is required for criminal liability under Section 304A IPC, and a mere error of judgment or deviation from accepted practice is insufficient; on the facts, the respondents could not be shown with the certainty needed for criminal culpability, so no conviction followed. Civil liability was assessed on the ordinary standard of medical care, and the Court found that the treatment, monitoring, and supportive care fell below the standard expected of reasonably competent medical professionals, establishing medical negligence and deficiency in service. The matter was remitted to the consumer forum for assessment of compensation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1229 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196815</link>
      <description>Gross medical negligence of a very high degree is required for criminal liability under Section 304A IPC, and a mere error of judgment or deviation from accepted practice is insufficient; on the facts, the respondents could not be shown with the certainty needed for criminal culpability, so no conviction followed. Civil liability was assessed on the ordinary standard of medical care, and the Court found that the treatment, monitoring, and supportive care fell below the standard expected of reasonably competent medical professionals, establishing medical negligence and deficiency in service. The matter was remitted to the consumer forum for assessment of compensation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>