https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196813 A writ petition challenging a commercial dealership dispute was held not maintainable where the contract contained an arbitration clause. The court restated that alternative remedy is a rule of discretion, not compulsion, but writ jurisdiction is reserved for recognised exceptions such as enforcement of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, or complete lack of jurisdiction. As no exceptional circumstance was shown, the agreed arbitral remedy could not be bypassed, and the parties were directed to arbitration. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:06:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196813 A writ petition challenging a commercial dealership dispute was held not maintainable where the contract contained an arbitration clause. The court restated that alternative remedy is a rule of discretion, not compulsion, but writ jurisdiction is reserved for recognised exceptions such as enforcement of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, or complete lack of jurisdiction. As no exceptional circumstance was shown, the agreed arbitral remedy could not be bypassed, and the parties were directed to arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196813