https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196812 An appeal under section 20(1) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 lies only against an order of the DRT that formally adjudicates upon and affects the parties' rights or liabilities. Purely procedural or interlocutory orders that merely regulate the conduct of proceedings do not determine substantive rights and are not appealable. The Act's objective of expeditious recovery would be undermined if appeals were entertained at every procedural stage. A purely procedural order was therefore treated as not appealable under section 20(1), and the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was not maintainable. en-us Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:06:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196812 An appeal under section 20(1) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 lies only against an order of the DRT that formally adjudicates upon and affects the parties' rights or liabilities. Purely procedural or interlocutory orders that merely regulate the conduct of proceedings do not determine substantive rights and are not appealable. The Act's objective of expeditious recovery would be undermined if appeals were entertained at every procedural stage. A purely procedural order was therefore treated as not appealable under section 20(1), and the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal was not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196812