<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1112 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196811</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal regarding stoppage of work and non-payment of bills in the Somasila Drinking Water Supply Scheme contract. The court emphasized that disputes under private contracts should be resolved through arbitration or civil courts, not writ petitions. It was concluded that the contract governed by private law should be enforced through the remedies provided in the agreement, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1112 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196811</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal regarding stoppage of work and non-payment of bills in the Somasila Drinking Water Supply Scheme contract. The court emphasized that disputes under private contracts should be resolved through arbitration or civil courts, not writ petitions. It was concluded that the contract governed by private law should be enforced through the remedies provided in the agreement, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>