https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196808 Where contracts for sale of goods fixed no time for performance, the parties' conduct governed reasonable performance. The buyer, having repeatedly postponed despatch and refused to accept liability for increased excise duty that could lawfully be added to the price, could not claim damages for non-performance to the extent his own conduct prevented completion. However, the seller remained liable for breach in relation to the three wagons it had specifically agreed to despatch but failed to supply. Damages for that limited breach were measured by the difference between the contract price and the market price at the time of breach, so recovery was confined to the undelivered three wagons. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:24:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196808 Where contracts for sale of goods fixed no time for performance, the parties' conduct governed reasonable performance. The buyer, having repeatedly postponed despatch and refused to accept liability for increased excise duty that could lawfully be added to the price, could not claim damages for non-performance to the extent his own conduct prevented completion. However, the seller remained liable for breach in relation to the three wagons it had specifically agreed to despatch but failed to supply. Damages for that limited breach were measured by the difference between the contract price and the market price at the time of breach, so recovery was confined to the undelivered three wagons. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196808