<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1062 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196806</link>
    <description>Family Courts under the Family Courts Act, 1984 are treated as courts with the trappings of a court because they decide specified family disputes through adjudicatory procedure, issue reasoned orders, and their orders are executable and appealable; their Presiding Officers are Judges in a limited statutory sense. However, Family Court Judges do not form part of the State judicial service where the governing service rules exclude them from the District Judge and civil judicial cadre. They also do not hold a judicial office for Article 217 elevation, since judicial office must fall within the constitutional judicial service scheme under Articles 233, 234 and 236, not merely involve adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1062 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196806</link>
      <description>Family Courts under the Family Courts Act, 1984 are treated as courts with the trappings of a court because they decide specified family disputes through adjudicatory procedure, issue reasoned orders, and their orders are executable and appealable; their Presiding Officers are Judges in a limited statutory sense. However, Family Court Judges do not form part of the State judicial service where the governing service rules exclude them from the District Judge and civil judicial cadre. They also do not hold a judicial office for Article 217 elevation, since judicial office must fall within the constitutional judicial service scheme under Articles 233, 234 and 236, not merely involve adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>