https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196804 A post-1948 category of workmen could not claim paid weekly off under the award or the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, because the award did not create a separate wage structure and no distinct entitlement for later entrants was shown. The claim for overtime wages also failed, as the demand had already been finally rejected in the prior award and the workmen had not raised a separate statutory basis earlier. The ruling applies the principle that an industrial adjudication conclusively deciding a wage claim bars re-litigation on alternative legal grounds. The appeal succeeded and the workmen's petitions failed. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:07:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196804 A post-1948 category of workmen could not claim paid weekly off under the award or the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, because the award did not create a separate wage structure and no distinct entitlement for later entrants was shown. The claim for overtime wages also failed, as the demand had already been finally rejected in the prior award and the workmen had not raised a separate statutory basis earlier. The ruling applies the principle that an industrial adjudication conclusively deciding a wage claim bars re-litigation on alternative legal grounds. The appeal succeeded and the workmen's petitions failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 12 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196804