https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196802 A person against whom an eviction decree has been passed may still be treated as a tenant for purposes of prior permission under the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956, and a suit for possession without such permission is incompetent. Where the competent authority has already determined the permission question, a later civil suit seeking substantially the same relief is barred by jurisdictional exclusion and res judicata. In a joint and indivisible decree, the appeal does not abate merely because one appellant dies if the surviving appellants retain an independent right to challenge the decree and seek relief under Order XLI, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196802 A person against whom an eviction decree has been passed may still be treated as a tenant for purposes of prior permission under the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956, and a suit for possession without such permission is incompetent. Where the competent authority has already determined the permission question, a later civil suit seeking substantially the same relief is barred by jurisdictional exclusion and res judicata. In a joint and indivisible decree, the appeal does not abate merely because one appellant dies if the surviving appellants retain an independent right to challenge the decree and seek relief under Order XLI, Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196802