https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196801 Appointments made regularly to substantive vacancies were treated as regular appointments for seniority purposes, including cases where promotee Deputy Collectors were placed in temporary additional posts or ex-cadre posts forming part of the cadre. Seniority followed continuous officiation under the governing quota arrangement, and a restrictive reading that would exclude such appointments was rejected. The matter was also treated as concluded by the earlier binding decision, so the same challenge could not be reopened. A further claim to additional vacancies beyond the accepted vacancy count was unsupported on the record and was not remitted for fresh inquiry. en-us Sun, 06 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:48:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196801 Appointments made regularly to substantive vacancies were treated as regular appointments for seniority purposes, including cases where promotee Deputy Collectors were placed in temporary additional posts or ex-cadre posts forming part of the cadre. Seniority followed continuous officiation under the governing quota arrangement, and a restrictive reading that would exclude such appointments was rejected. The matter was also treated as concluded by the earlier binding decision, so the same challenge could not be reopened. A further claim to additional vacancies beyond the accepted vacancy count was unsupported on the record and was not remitted for fresh inquiry. Case-Laws Companies Law Sun, 06 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196801