<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10968</link>
    <description>After the 1989 amendment to section 263, the Commissioner&#039;s revisional jurisdiction was not barred merely because the assessment order had been appealed against and had merged in the appellate order, so the revision power remained available. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee satisfied the conditions for deduction under section 80HH was a factual finding and, absent any legal infirmity, was sustained on reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10968</link>
      <description>After the 1989 amendment to section 263, the Commissioner&#039;s revisional jurisdiction was not barred merely because the assessment order had been appealed against and had merged in the appellate order, so the revision power remained available. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee satisfied the conditions for deduction under section 80HH was a factual finding and, absent any legal infirmity, was sustained on reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>