https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196797 The court held that the tendering authority cannot discharge a tender without providing reasons. It found the railway respondents' actions arbitrary and emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in administrative decisions. The court set aside the decisions discharging the tenders and directed the railway respondents to consider the highest bids if the petitioners accepted the non-incorporated clause. The petitioners were given seven days to provide an undertaking, and the railway respondents were instructed to determine the tender within fifteen days. The writ petitions were allowed with no costs. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:44:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196797 The court held that the tendering authority cannot discharge a tender without providing reasons. It found the railway respondents' actions arbitrary and emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in administrative decisions. The court set aside the decisions discharging the tenders and directed the railway respondents to consider the highest bids if the petitioners accepted the non-incorporated clause. The petitioners were given seven days to provide an undertaking, and the railway respondents were instructed to determine the tender within fifteen days. The writ petitions were allowed with no costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196797