<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 873 - High Court Gauhati</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196796</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Single Judge&#039;s order in a case concerning the cancellation of a tender process by a Railway authority. The Court emphasized the importance of public interest and judicial restraint in administrative actions. It concluded that the cancellation was justified due to the absence of necessary clauses in the tender notice, dismissing the writ petition and granting the appellant liberty to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 873 - High Court Gauhati</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196796</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Single Judge&#039;s order in a case concerning the cancellation of a tender process by a Railway authority. The Court emphasized the importance of public interest and judicial restraint in administrative actions. It concluded that the cancellation was justified due to the absence of necessary clauses in the tender notice, dismissing the writ petition and granting the appellant liberty to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>