<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 749 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that if the recipient declared finance charges as income, the assessee is not in default under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act. However, the assessee must provide evidence of this declaration. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the recipient&#039;s declaration; if confirmed, no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) is necessary. The order was modified accordingly, partially allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 749 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that if the recipient declared finance charges as income, the assessee is not in default under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act. However, the assessee must provide evidence of this declaration. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the recipient&#039;s declaration; if confirmed, no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) is necessary. The order was modified accordingly, partially allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>