<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 746 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352477</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the validity of the assessment reopening and the addition based on alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal agreed that the reopening was justified due to information from the Investigation Wing and upheld a 6% disallowance on the bogus purchases. The denial of cross-examination was deemed unnecessary. Both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 746 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352477</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the validity of the assessment reopening and the addition based on alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal agreed that the reopening was justified due to information from the Investigation Wing and upheld a 6% disallowance on the bogus purchases. The denial of cross-examination was deemed unnecessary. Both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>