<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352463</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petitions challenging the summons, ruling them as not maintainable. It affirmed the jurisdiction of the Senior Intelligence Officer to issue the summons under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners were instructed to comply with the summons and provide the requested documents for the investigation. The court emphasized that judicial interference in investigative processes is unwarranted unless there is a clear legal breach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 732 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352463</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petitions challenging the summons, ruling them as not maintainable. It affirmed the jurisdiction of the Senior Intelligence Officer to issue the summons under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners were instructed to comply with the summons and provide the requested documents for the investigation. The court emphasized that judicial interference in investigative processes is unwarranted unless there is a clear legal breach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>