<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 728 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352459</link>
    <description>Denial of cross-examination and other elements of a fair hearing were treated as a breach of natural justice that could not be cured at the appellate stage. The Tribunal held that the appellant had to be heard and that the adjudication could not stand without proper consideration of the evidence and written submissions already on record. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration on merits, with directions to grant a hearing and pass a new order after examining the existing material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 728 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352459</link>
      <description>Denial of cross-examination and other elements of a fair hearing were treated as a breach of natural justice that could not be cured at the appellate stage. The Tribunal held that the appellant had to be heard and that the adjudication could not stand without proper consideration of the evidence and written submissions already on record. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration on merits, with directions to grant a hearing and pass a new order after examining the existing material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>