<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 727 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the refund claim dismissal on limitation grounds was unsustainable. It ruled that the duty payment during investigation was a deposit, not subject to the limitation period, and exempt from unjust enrichment principles. The appellant was entitled to interest on the delayed refund, following precedents for interest entitlement from the date of refund application until granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 727 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the refund claim dismissal on limitation grounds was unsustainable. It ruled that the duty payment during investigation was a deposit, not subject to the limitation period, and exempt from unjust enrichment principles. The appellant was entitled to interest on the delayed refund, following precedents for interest entitlement from the date of refund application until granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>