<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 720 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals for refund of service tax paid on input services used in software export. The adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection based on discrepancies in FIRCs was deemed legally unsustainable as the appellant demonstrated service export, proper accounting, and validation of remittance receipt. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with proper documentation and adherence to statutory rules, calling for a consistent approach by authorities in assessing refund applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 720 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals for refund of service tax paid on input services used in software export. The adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection based on discrepancies in FIRCs was deemed legally unsustainable as the appellant demonstrated service export, proper accounting, and validation of remittance receipt. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with proper documentation and adherence to statutory rules, calling for a consistent approach by authorities in assessing refund applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>