https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352435 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confirmed duty demand by the Ld. Commissioner (A) regarding remission of duty on finished goods lost in a fire accident. The Tribunal found that the appellant had fulfilled the necessary requirements and provided sufficient evidence to prove the unavoidable nature of the fire accident. Relying on the Grasim Industries decision, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to remission of duty and was not required to reverse Cenvat credit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting the appellant relief and affirming their claim for remission of duty. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Feb 2018 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352435 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confirmed duty demand by the Ld. Commissioner (A) regarding remission of duty on finished goods lost in a fire accident. The Tribunal found that the appellant had fulfilled the necessary requirements and provided sufficient evidence to prove the unavoidable nature of the fire accident. Relying on the Grasim Industries decision, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to remission of duty and was not required to reverse Cenvat credit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting the appellant relief and affirming their claim for remission of duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352435