https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352427 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD, in a case concerning alleged clandestine removal of goods based on shortages detected during a visit, ruled in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and thorough investigations to establish clandestine activities, highlighting that shortages alone are insufficient to prove such allegations. Citing precedents, the Tribunal set aside the demand upheld by the original adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals), underscoring the importance of robust evidence beyond mere shortages to substantiate claims of clandestine removal. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:36:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352427 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD, in a case concerning alleged clandestine removal of goods based on shortages detected during a visit, ruled in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and thorough investigations to establish clandestine activities, highlighting that shortages alone are insufficient to prove such allegations. Citing precedents, the Tribunal set aside the demand upheld by the original adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals), underscoring the importance of robust evidence beyond mere shortages to substantiate claims of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352427