<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 694 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further examination. It emphasized the importance of proper scrutiny of records, adherence to procedural requirements, and consideration of all relevant evidence before confirming demands related to Cenvat Credit and Central Excise Duty. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present their case effectively in the remand proceedings, highlighting principles of natural justice and fair adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 694 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further examination. It emphasized the importance of proper scrutiny of records, adherence to procedural requirements, and consideration of all relevant evidence before confirming demands related to Cenvat Credit and Central Excise Duty. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present their case effectively in the remand proceedings, highlighting principles of natural justice and fair adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>