<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1161 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196795</link>
    <description>Under a special anti-terror statute, sanction for prosecution must reflect independent application of mind to the investigation material, and a defective sanction is invalid. Confessions recorded by police are admissible only where the statutory warnings, free atmosphere, timely production before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, and custody safeguards are strictly followed; serious departures render them inadmissible. Accomplice testimony requires independent corroboration in material particulars, and disputed documentary recoveries and handwriting evidence must be proved to a reliable standard. Retracted confessions and uncorroborated accomplice evidence cannot, by themselves, sustain proof of conspiracy or conviction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1161 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196795</link>
      <description>Under a special anti-terror statute, sanction for prosecution must reflect independent application of mind to the investigation material, and a defective sanction is invalid. Confessions recorded by police are admissible only where the statutory warnings, free atmosphere, timely production before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, and custody safeguards are strictly followed; serious departures render them inadmissible. Accomplice testimony requires independent corroboration in material particulars, and disputed documentary recoveries and handwriting evidence must be proved to a reliable standard. Retracted confessions and uncorroborated accomplice evidence cannot, by themselves, sustain proof of conspiracy or conviction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>