<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1294 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196789</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles in quasi-judicial functions related to tax matters. It directed the competent authority to reconsider the case, allowing the petitioner a fair hearing to contest the reduction in approved expenditure for scientific research. The court ordered the petitioner to appear for a hearing and mandated the authority to issue a reasoned order within six months. The petitioner was granted the right to pursue further legal remedies if unsatisfied. No costs were awarded, highlighting the significance of a fair process and proper consideration of the petitioner&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1294 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196789</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles in quasi-judicial functions related to tax matters. It directed the competent authority to reconsider the case, allowing the petitioner a fair hearing to contest the reduction in approved expenditure for scientific research. The court ordered the petitioner to appear for a hearing and mandated the authority to issue a reasoned order within six months. The petitioner was granted the right to pursue further legal remedies if unsatisfied. No costs were awarded, highlighting the significance of a fair process and proper consideration of the petitioner&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>