<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1283 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision regarding the interpretation of Sections 12AA and 80G(5)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the rejection of the application for registration and approval invalid due to the absence of proper proceedings conducted by the authorized Commissioner. The Tribunal emphasized that the Deputy Director (Systems) lacked the authority to conduct such proceedings, leading to a violation of the Act. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Exemptions) for reconsideration in compliance with the law, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1283 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision regarding the interpretation of Sections 12AA and 80G(5)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the rejection of the application for registration and approval invalid due to the absence of proper proceedings conducted by the authorized Commissioner. The Tribunal emphasized that the Deputy Director (Systems) lacked the authority to conduct such proceedings, leading to a violation of the Act. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Exemptions) for reconsideration in compliance with the law, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>