https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352416 The Court held that issuing a Writ of Prohibition at that stage would be premature, and the petitioners were required to produce the records for examination. The Court emphasized that the second respondent needed to examine the documents to determine the taxability of the services provided. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, directing the petitioners to appear before the second respondent within two weeks to produce the records. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:24:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352416 The Court held that issuing a Writ of Prohibition at that stage would be premature, and the petitioners were required to produce the records for examination. The Court emphasized that the second respondent needed to examine the documents to determine the taxability of the services provided. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, directing the petitioners to appear before the second respondent within two weeks to produce the records. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352416