<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 683 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352414</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellant in a case concerning service tax liability on marketing services and eligibility for CENVAT credit. The tribunal remanded the matter for further verification of documents related to CENVAT credit eligibility, emphasizing the importance of genuine belief as a factor in determining penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 683 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352414</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellant in a case concerning service tax liability on marketing services and eligibility for CENVAT credit. The tribunal remanded the matter for further verification of documents related to CENVAT credit eligibility, emphasizing the importance of genuine belief as a factor in determining penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>