https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352412 The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the addition to his undisclosed income. The Court found the Tribunal's decision unjustified, noting the lack of seized jewellery from the appellant during search proceedings, aligning his case with his brother's where the addition was set aside. Emphasizing the similarity between the cases and the absence of supporting material, the Court found in favor of the appellant, highlighting concerns regarding the Tribunal's inconsistent treatment of identical circumstances. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352412 The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the addition to his undisclosed income. The Court found the Tribunal's decision unjustified, noting the lack of seized jewellery from the appellant during search proceedings, aligning his case with his brother's where the addition was set aside. Emphasizing the similarity between the cases and the absence of supporting material, the Court found in favor of the appellant, highlighting concerns regarding the Tribunal's inconsistent treatment of identical circumstances. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352412